According to Tovani , accessible texts are “interesting,
well written, and appropriately matched to the level of my students” (P39). Later
on in the chapter, Tovani explains that that despite what certain people might
think, using accessible texts doesn’t lower standards of rigor; accessible
texts are simply giving students “something that they actually have the
potential to understand” (P40)
I am a huge fan of accessible texts, and like Tovani, I also
believe that accessible texts can engage disengaged readers, especially if the
students have a choice over what to read. In this blog, I would like to explore
the possibilities and limitations of using such texts in our classrooms based
on my own experiences.
When I was teaching “Romeo and Juliet”, I used a variety of
modified texts that made the actual “Romeo and Juliet” much more accessible to
my kids. My students struggled with the language, as well as with the rich
description which was really confusing them. I did some research and found a
great graphic novel version of the play (“Romeo and Juliet Graphic Novel: Plain
Text”), and I photocopied the more challenging scenes to read with my students,
instead of reading from the actual play. Seeing the images while reading not
only helped my students to better understand the play, but they also got a lot
more into the story. Something else that
I found particularly useful during this unit is the “No Fear Shakespeare”
version of the play. For those of you not familiar with this version, the “No
Fear” collection is written by SparkNotes and it is a modern day translation of
the play. For the lengthier scenes of the play, I photocopied the No Fear version
which allowed us to cover a particular scene a lot quicker, without any of my
students getting lost.
In this example, I used accessible texts to better meet all
of my reader’s learning needs, instead of just the disengaged or reluctant
readers because I felt that the whole class would benefit from these texts. However,
accessible texts can also be used with particular students who need extra
support in your class. The only downside of using accessible texts is that such
texts are often expensive (graphic novels can be pretty pricey), and so you
will rarely be able to purchase a big enough quantity.
Works Cited
Tovani, Cris. Do I Really Have to Teach Reading?: Content Comprehension, Grades 6-12. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers, 2004. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment