In Chapter 5 of Cris Tovani’s Do I Really Have to Teach Reading? (2004) we are introduced to the idea of
using purpose as a reading strategy.
Whether as a student or an educator, we have all likely been in a
classroom when a student asks why they are reading the current assignment. In my own high school experience, it was
something the English teachers heard daily.
Rarely, however, did they provide any sort of answer or response. It was a “because I said so” kind of
situation. For most students, it was
assumed that we were required to read certain texts so that we could pass
certain exams. The goal was being able
to regurgitate character names and key plot points, and so that is what we read
for.
Tovani explains that the goal, or purpose, readers
have while reading affects both the speed at which they read, as well as what
information they retain. When thinking
about my own reading, this makes perfect sense.
I read at a completely different pace with attention to different
elements depending upon the type of text I am reading and what my overall
purpose with the text is. With that
being said, it is a wonder to me that my teachers never communicated the idea
of purpose while reading in high school.
As Tovani (2004) says, “teachers have to be clear in their reasons for
assigning the reading. Students need to know what those reasons are so they can
better determine what is important” (p. 52).
As an actor, you develop both objectives and
super-objectives. Objectives may be your
character’s purpose for a single action or scene, while a super objective would
be an overarching motivator throughout the play or film. Tovani discusses in great detail the
importance of narrowing down very precise purposes for reading specific
texts. These would be our students’
objectives. What I cannot help but think
about, however, is the super objective.
Defining purpose for our students should also be considered on the content
level. If we are to motivate our
students to read, but also to want to read, they must first understand the
significant role written communication will play in their lives outside of
school. In this way, I see a connection
between Tovani’s idea of setting purpose, and Alfred W. Tatum’s (2012) call for an
awareness of historical literacy roles.
If students classify their English class as unimportant, they are
unlikely to devote much mental energy to the class and the work. For this reason, I believe it is imperative
to communicate the powerful role literacy plays outside of the classroom as
well.
These readings on purpose and motivation have given me
a lot to think about. I look forward to finding
ways of implementing the role of purpose as both a reading strategy and an
overall engagement strategy with my future students.
Reference List:
Tatum, A. W. (2012). Literacy Practices for
African-American Male Adolescents. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.
Tovani, C. (2004). Do I Really Have to Teach
Reading? Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
No comments:
Post a Comment